Search Google Appliance

Patent Waiver Guidelines

Waiver of PSU Patent Ownership Back To Inventors

According to policy and PSU guidelines, PSU employees must disclose to IIP all inventions created by them while employed by PSU, and PSU employees (and in some cases students) will be required to assign ownership of most of their inventions to the the State of Oregon.  Most is not all, however, and there are instances where after disclosure of an invention PSU can proactively waive the state’s rights to that invention back to the inventor.

There are two general cases where this might be true.  First, when an inventor feels that the invention was made outside of and unrelated to their work assignment and without the use of institutional resources, and second, when PSU decides not to pursue a patent on an invention that it would otherwise own, and the inventors wish to pursue it on their own.

The waiver process in either case is as much for the inventors’ protection as to follow state policy.  A lack of clarity about the ownership chain of a patent can severely derail its later value to an outside business or faculty start-up, and having a clear waiver of states rights can prevent this pitfall.  

Waiver to inventions not owned by the state

To request a finding that any particular invention does not belong to the state, the inventor should submit a request to IIP prior to filing any intellectual property protection, or signing any documents provided by third parties.  The request should include:

  • Description of the invention in sufficient detail that it can be identified later if filed by the inventor or a third party, and be identified as distinct from other intellectual property.
  • Description of how the invention was developed.
  • An explanation of why the invention should not be owned by the state under policy.

Answers to the following questions will be important in evaluating any request:

  • Where was the intellectual property developed?
  • What funding was used?
  • When was the intellectual property developed – beginning, middle & end?
  • What is the current stage of development of the intellectual property?

After a complete request is received by IIP, it and any relevant information are forwarded to the appropriate Chair(s) and Dean(s) for review.  After discussion with these and any other applicable university officials, the request is reviewed by the Vice President for Research and Strategic Partnerships.  A letter will finally be sent to the requestor(s) with either a waiver and relevant conditions, or a denial and its reasons.

The waiver will only be for the exact invention described in the invention disclosure and/or request for waiver, and not for any improvements or new inventions to be included in follow-on patent applications.  Each new invention must be waived as they are made and before they are filed.  

Waiver to inventions not pursued by the state

After an invention disclosure is made to IIP, we sometimes decide not to pursue patent protection on it. Occasionally we will cease pursuing patent protection on an idea for which we had already started the patent process.  The decision is usually based on the maturity of the technology, industry feedback, resources at hand to further develop the technology, and of course the overall likelihood that a patent will be a good tool for increasing the impact and promoting the use of the underlying innovation.  In most cases, we reach this decision with the consensus of the inventors, faculty, or research group.  However, situations may arise when inventors wish to continue to pursue patent protection even after PSU has made the decision not to pursue it.

In these cases, at the inventors’ request, PSU can waive the state’s ownership.  If the invention was made with federal funding, PSU’s waiving ownership will first cause ownership to revert to the funding agency.  The inventors will then need to request that the funding agency waive ownership back to them.  

When the inventors have gained ownership, they are free to pursue patent protection at their own expense. Unfortunately, the state policy still posits that when the patent is licensed or otherwise exploited, after the inventors recoup their own costs and retain the first $10,000 of royalties, the remainder of the net royalty income is split equally with the state.