Local Election Official (LEO) Survey

About the LEO Survey

The Local Election Official (LEO) Survey assesses the state of American election administration directly through the lens of the people running it. These officials serve as the "stewards of democracy," playing a critical front-line role in supporting and advancing our electoral system. First fielded in 2018, this yearly, nationally representative survey tracks the administrative, policy, and operational conditions of election officials across the U.S., providing vital, data-backed insights into everything from workforce well-being and public trust to the operational impacts of state policies, budgets, and technology.

2024 LEO Cover - sorting ballots

2024 LEO Survey

The 2024 Survey of Local Election Officials (LEOs) is the sixth survey conducted by EVIC. The survey provides LEOs with an important, timely, and respectfully brief opportunity to weigh in on issues of concern in their profession.

The survey was fielded from mid-July to mid-October 2024 to a sample of over 3,100 randomly selected LEOs. We thank the local election officials in advance for their thoughtful responses to our questions.

The 2024 LEO Survey is supported by grants from the Democracy Fund and the Election Trust Initiative. EVIC is solely responsible for the content, administration, and use of the survey results.

Survey History

In 2018, EVIC recognized a critical gap in the national conversation about elections: the voices of the people actually running them were missing. The LEO Survey was created to fill that gap - hearing directly from front-line officials to better understand the day-to-day realities of their vital work. What began as a foundational study of workforce well-being and civic motivation has since grown into a nationally representative longitudinal dataset that continuously adapts to capture real-time challenges - from tracking logistical adaptations during the 2020 pandemic to measuring the impacts of emerging policies and new technologies.

Elections office front desk

LEO Survey Measure Categories 

The following categories represent survey questions that cycle every few years or are new additions, grouped by subject matter.

Workforce & Well-being

  • Job Satisfaction & Motivation: Sentiment on workload, pay, and respect; the official's altruistic drive and civic impact
  • Workload & Hours: Measurement of typical weekly hours during and outside of election periods, and perceived changes in workload volume
  • Burnout Indicators: Measurement of internal and external professional stressors
  • Threats & Harassment: Baseline threat experiences, resulting staff departures, and changes to office security
  • Retirement, Exit, & Succession: Retirement eligibility, stated intent and reasons to leave the profession, and organizational readiness for turnover
  • Hiring & Staffing: Recruitment and retention difficulties, permanent and temporary staffing barriers, and staff management during peak workloads
  • Training Needs: General training sources and effectiveness, preferred training modalities, specific training topics, and internal cross-training or staff sharing practices

Election Administration Climate, Public Trust & Engagement

  • Professional Networks & Support: External organizational memberships, sources of support, evaluation of organizations and effectiveness of support
  • Election Confidence & Preparedness: Confidence in local, state, and national count accuracy, registration security, and overall readiness
  • Voter Inclusion & Education: Attitudes toward civic inclusion and turnout, public outreach methods and perceived effectiveness of outreach
  • Misinformation & Election Skepticism: Efforts to combat misinformation and engage skeptics, as well as concerns regarding institutional fraud beliefs
  • Perceived Public Reputation: Official perceptions of how the public views their competence, fairness, and professional integrity

Policy, Budgets & Operations

  • Jurisdiction Scope & Duties: Election-related administrative tasks managed by the office and a quantitative measure of the total volume of elections administered annually
  • Election Policy & Legislative Impact: Tracking of support for election reforms, evaluations of how state legislation has impacted local office operations
  • Resource & Budgeting: Composition of revenue sources and new investment priorities, evaluations of the budget approval process
  • Information & Support Priorities: Identification of primary information sources and evaluation of support priorities from state and federal agencies required to successfully manage election cycles
  • Technology, Cybersecurity & AI: Digital modernization and technology adoption, including cybersecurity training and the emerging operational impact and policies regarding Artificial Intelligence
  • Public Records & Audits: Volume and administrative burden of public records requests; timing, independence, and public reporting of post-election tabulation audits
  • Political Pressure & Ethics: Partisan coercion and threats; ethical dilemmas regarding political activity and neutrality

The following represent categories of foundational metrics collected in every (or nearly every) survey cycle.

  • Demographics: Age, gender, racial/ethnic background, highest degree earned, and annual salary
  • Partisanship: Measurement of party identification on a 7-point scale
  • Current Role & Path to Office: Current status as a chief official, work schedule, how the position was acquired, and (where applicable) type of election
  • Career History & Tenure: Years of experience, prior employment status, past service in other jurisdictions, and early career details
  • Office Staffing: Total permanent FTE staff and the subset fully dedicated to elections
  • One Change: Open-ended about the single most impactful change to improve state elections

These categories represent one-off or limited-run modules designed to measure specific historical transitions or specific questions. They are maintained in the historical dataset but have not been fielded recently.

  • Pre-HAVA Baseline: Comparisons of modern election administration to prior eras
  • Policy & Structural Preferences: Priorities balancing access versus security and preferences for official selection methods
  • OVR/AVR Implementation: Administrative difficulty, financial costs, and data impacts resulting from the transition to online and automated voter registration
  • Past Cycle Readiness & Performance: Evaluations of resource sufficiency and performance satisfaction for the 2018, 2020, and 2022 election cycles
  • COVID-19 Response: Operational policy shifts, polling place disruptions, and impacts due to COVID-19 

Graphic of LEO Survey Measues