Springfield Oregon Public Safety Survey (2022)

Springfield Oregon Public Safety Survey 
(2022)  

Problem

The Problem Addressed: 

The study aimed to assess community perceptions of public safety and the Springfield Police Department (SPD). It evaluated public trust, cooperation, and satisfaction with police services to understand how well the SPD is meeting public expectations in a democratic society.

General Impact: 

The results provide critical insights for improving SPD’s community engagement, trust-building efforts, and operational strategies. These findings aim to foster stronger police-community relationships and ensure public safety aligns with community needs.
 

Research Questions Answered:

  1. How willing are residents to cooperate with the SPD in crime control?
  2. What are residents’ levels of trust in the SPD?
  3. How satisfied are residents with SPD’s community engagement and handling of public safety issues?

     

Method and Analysis

Program Evaluated/Gaps Addressed: 

The survey addressed gaps in community trust, cooperation, and perceptions of safety by evaluating the SPD's performance and areas for improvement. It also assessed the impact of procedural justice in police interactions.
 

Data and Sample Size: 

  • Random Survey: 861 responses from 7,500 households (12% response rate).
  • Open Survey: 858 responses collected via public postings.
  • Total: 1,719 usable responses.
     

Analysis Used:

  • Statistical testing compared responses from the Random and Open samples.
  • Mean scores were calculated for trust, cooperation, and satisfaction.
  • Demographic and behavioral differences were analyzed to identify trends and gaps.
     

Outcome

Key Findings:

Cooperation: 

  • High willingness to cooperate with SPD, with Random sample scoring higher (mean 4.56) than Open sample (mean 4.43).
  • Younger residents and recent crime victims showed lower cooperation levels.

Trust:

  • 70-73% of the Random sample trusted SPD to make community-centric decisions.
  • Younger and newer residents expressed lower trust levels.

Community Engagement:

  • Majorities rated SPD positively, but "involving community in crime prevention" was the lowest-rated area.
  • Younger and victimized respondents gave less favorable ratings.

Safety Perceptions:

  • Most felt safe during the day but less so at night, particularly downtown (only 31% felt safe).

Procedural Justice:

  • Satisfaction with police interactions rose significantly when officers adhered to principles like fairness, respect, and transparency.

Public Safety Issues:

  • Traffic offenses (e.g., speeding, distracted driving) and drug-related crimes were seen as major problems.

     

Implications/Recommendations: 

  • Trust and Cooperation: Target initiatives to engage younger and newer residents.
  • Community Engagement: Expand efforts in crime prevention and public involvement.
  • Procedural Justice: Emphasize respectful and transparent officer behavior through training.
  • Public Safety Management: Address concerns about nighttime safety and traffic issues with tailored enforcement and community programs.

This research underscores the importance of ongoing efforts in transparency, accountability, and targeted interventions to enhance public trust and cooperation in law enforcement.

Authors

Kris Henning, Ph.D., Portland State University
Greg Stewart, MS., Portland State University
 

Tags

Policing

 

Report