Problem
The problem the study aimed to address:
The study investigates the gap in rape myth acceptance (RMA) intervention research, which has primarily focused on college student populations, leaving nonstudent demographics underexplored. RMA involves false beliefs about rape, often reinforcing victim-blaming and minimizing the seriousness of sexual assault.
General impact on the system and/or public:
RMA has significant societal consequences, influencing law enforcement responses, jury decisions, and survivors' willingness to report. Addressing this issue in nonstudent populations could reduce these impacts across broader societal domains.
Research Questions:
- Can education on rape myths alter RMA scores among nonstudent participants?
- To what extent can demographics account for changes in RMA scores post-intervention?
Method and Analysis
Program Evaluated/Gaps Addressed:
This study evaluates the efficacy of a 10-minute informal educational video designed to debunk common rape myths in a nonstudent sample. It aims to expand RMA research beyond academic contexts to the general population.
Data and Sample Size:
- Sample Size: 137 nonstudent participants recruited via Amazon's Mechanical Turk.
- Eligibility: Participants were U.S.-based adults not enrolled in higher education.
Analysis Used:
- Pretest and posttest RMA scores were measured using an adapted version of the Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (U-IRMA) scale.
- The treatment group viewed an educational video on rape myths, while the control group watched unrelated content.
- Analyses included Mann–Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and linear regression models to evaluate score changes and demographic impacts.
Outcome
Key Findings:
- Intervention Effectiveness:
- The treatment group exhibited significant reductions in RMA scores from pretest to posttest compared to the control group.
- The educational video was the primary factor influencing changes in RMA, with no significant demographic predictors of change.
- Control Group Findings:
- Modest RMA score reductions in the control group suggest potential retest biases or external influences.
Implications or Recommendations:
- Practical Applications:
- The success of a short, informal intervention supports broader implementation in community settings, workplaces, and social media platforms.
- Incorporating RMA education into existing programs like self-defense training or workplace harassment seminars could enhance societal awareness.
- Future Research:
- Long-term effects of informal RMA interventions need exploration.
- Further examination of demographic variables and potential enhancements to the U-IRMA scale could refine RMA interventions.
This study underscores the potential of informal, accessible education in mitigating rape myth adherence, offering valuable insights for expanding sexual violence prevention efforts across diverse populations.