A Comparison of Men and Women Arrested for Domestic Violence: Who Presents the Greater Threat?

A Comparison of Men and Women Arrested for Domestic Violence: 
Who Presents the Greater Threat?

Problem

The problem the study aimed to address: 

The study investigates the increasing arrests of women for domestic violence, questioning whether this trend reflects equitable law enforcement or improper application of mandatory arrest policies. It examines gender differences in risk factors for domestic violence recidivism and severity to better understand implications for criminal justice policies.

General impact on the system and/or public: 

Understanding these gender dynamics could enhance the equitable implementation of pro-arrest policies, ensuring that law enforcement effectively mitigates risks without criminalizing victims of defensive aggression.

Research Questions:

  1. What are the demographic and criminal history differences between male and female domestic violence arrestees?
  2. How do male and female arrestees differ in the severity and context of their offenses?
  3. Do female domestic violence arrestees pose the same level of risk for recidivism as male arrestees?
     

Method and Analysis

Program Evaluated or Gaps Addressed: 

The study addresses gaps in understanding gender-specific risks and behavior patterns in domestic violence, focusing on implications for pro-arrest policies and criminal justice interventions.
 

Data and Sample Size: 

The study analyzed data from 6,704 individuals arrested for domestic violence in Shelby County, TN, between December 1997 and March 2001. Data sources included arrest affidavits, victim interviews, and pretrial service records.
 

Analysis Used:

Quantitative analysis was conducted using chi-square tests for categorical variables and independent t-tests for continuous measures. Statistical significance was set conservatively to reduce Type I errors.
 

Outcome

Key Findings:

  • Demographics: Women represented 16.8% of arrests. Female arrestees were generally younger and more likely to be unemployed than males.
  • Criminal History: Male arrestees had significantly higher rates of prior violent offenses, probation violations, and substance abuse histories.
  • Offense Characteristics: Female arrestees were more often involved in dual arrests and more likely to use weapons, but males were more likely to escalate violence and pose threats.
  • Recidivism Risk: Male arrestees presented a higher risk for repeat and severe offenses based on factors such as prior violence and substance abuse.
     

Implications or Recommendations: 

  • Policy Adjustments: The study suggests reevaluating the handling of female domestic violence arrestees, particularly in cases of defensive aggression, to prevent unnecessary criminalization of victims.
  • Treatment Focus: Male offenders require targeted interventions due to their higher risk of recidivism and violence severity, while female offenders may benefit from support addressing victimization and specific social challenges.
  • Future Research: Further studies should include comparative analyses of male and female victims alongside offenders to understand relational dynamics and enhance risk assessment models.

Authors

Kris Henning, Portland State University
Lynette Feder, Portland State University
 

Tags

Criminology

 

Report