General Education Task Force

  • Understand the perceptions of and purpose of General Education at PSU 
  • Conduct research on models of General Education and how we can better meet the needs of our students
  • Share findings of the task force with the community, faculty senate, and administration

Timeline

Image includes a timeline of project from Winter 2025 to Winter 2026.

Background

The University Honors College (HON) has been in operation since 1969 with a focus on academic writing and research. In 1994, moving away from a distribution model of general education, PSU adopted an integrative model of general education, the University Studies (UNST) program. The 4-year UNST Program replaced a distribution model that included disciplinary requirements, a writing requirement and a diversity requirement. 

The UNST program was very innovative for its time and generated a lot of excitement at and beyond PSU. For example, the implementation of freshmen experiences that both create community and provide students with skills for success in college is now quite commonplace across US campuses due in part to the work of our colleagues. Within a few years after implementing the new program, however, faculty had concerns about whether all expectations for a bachelor’s degree were being met. In response to those concerns, the Faculty Senate changed the BA and BS requirements to include disciplinary distribution requirements. The writing requirement was eventually restored as a graduation requirement for transfer students (UNST and HON meet students’ writing requirements). The Race and Ethnic Studies Requirement was adopted to ensure a specific focus on race as part of a student’s experience at PSU. 

As a result, we now have a hybrid system: the University Studies or Honors 4-year integrative program and the university’s distribution-model graduation and degree requirements. One major goal of Gen Ed reform will be to find a way to simplify the current system without sacrificing the goals of general education.

Subcommittees

Current PSU Student Needs

Charge:

  • Review our current student demographics and student needs using institutional data.
  • Review the current literature identifying what graduates need to be successful in life, work, and engaged citizenship in the 21st century.
  • Research and report on what HIPs, curricular structures, and integrated support best address those identified needs.
  • Review the kinds of co-curricular structures associated with GE that support students.
  • Consult with related stakeholders on campus (Housing, SHAC, Advising and Career Services, DRC, resource centers, etc).
  • Report on where our current system is addressing those needs and where improvements are needed.

Members:

Becki Ingersoll  |  Ben Anderson-Nathe  |  Betty Izumi  |  Christopher Carey | Espie De La Vega  |  Greg Flores  | Nick Matlick  |  Rebecca Summer  |  Sarah Dougher

 

Key Competencies and Literacies of General Education

Charge:

  • Provide a comprehensive review of key general education competencies, literacies, and learning outcomes for undergraduate students across the country, including a focus on institutions with similar mission and student demographics.
  • Consider the range and level of key competencies delivered by Oregon high schools in order to identify needs and gaps.
  • Consult with related stakeholders on campus, including the Writing Council, Honors Council, and UNST Council.
  • Determine  how the learning goals and mission of GE at PSU fit into the current national landscape and assess whether revisions to current goals are necessary to best prepare students for success in their academic pursuits, careers, and civic lives.
  • Identify opportunities for assessment of PSU student achievement in key competencies and literacies.

Members:

Alissa Hartig  |  Amanda Singer  |  Amy E. Borden  |  Elizabeth Pickard  |  Grant Scribner | J. Forrest Williams  |  Kate Comer  |  Sarah Wolf Newlands  |  Shoshana Zeisman-Pereyo

Finances and Institutional Data

Charge:

  • Describe the ways GE-related credit requirements fit into the bachelor degree pathways. Identify possible issues and opportunities in these pathways.
  • Summarize assessments of and recommendations regarding the General Education programs (UNST, HON, BA/BS requirements, RESR) at PSU  from external program reviews, internal program reviews, and Faculty Senate.
  • Assess changes made in light of those recommendations.
  • Compile a data report and analysis of GE in terms of enrollment, budget model distribution of GE credits, responsibility of teaching and assessment of GE courses; identify any blockages to graduation related to GE in the data.
  • Research administrative structures and, to extent possible, budget structures, of GE programs at comparator institutions.
  • Consult with related stakeholders on campus, including the Registrar, Advising, OIRP, and Faculty Senate Budget Committee.
  • Compile a data report and analysis on resource challenges.

Members:

Andreen Morris  |  Brianna Avery  |  Jacob Suher  |  J.R. "Jones" Estes | Mitch Cruzan  |  Peter Dusicka  |  Rowanna Carpenter  |  Trevino Brings Plenty

National Models of General Education and High Impact Practices

Charge:

  • Research current national models for delivering GE, with a particular focus on institutions that have similar mission and student demographics, and identify “best practices.”
  • Research the processes through which other universities have recently assessed and refreshed their GE.
  • Assess how our current model aligns with those “best practices” and where it could be improved.

Members:

Benjamin Mendelsohn  |  Cassio de Oliveira  |  Cristina Herrera  |  Harry York  |  Joel Bettridge | Marc Rodriguez  |  Melody Valdini  |  Miriam Abelson  |  Seanna Kerrigan  |  Theresa McCormick

Symposium attendees gathered at tables watching four student speakers sitting on a small stage

Winter Symposium: Exploring The Role of General Education, Past, Present and Future

On February 18th, 2025, PSU community gathered for our Winter Symposium on Gen Ed. This symposium was intended to provide a rich description of where we have been and currently are in our delivery of Gen Ed and ground the collaborative work needed to understand how Gen Ed can best serve our future students.

Feedback, comments, concerns, and ideas