The full report is available as a portable document format (pdf) file. You'll need a pdf reader like Adobe Acrobat to view and print the file.
In January 2005, President Daniel O. Bernstine formed the Task Force on Integrated Marketing, charging its members with guiding and engaging Portland State's campus community in a process to translate the University's mission, vision, and values into a set of key messages and a visual identity program to help close the gap between perception and reality. The following is a summary of the Task Force's results and recommendations for future consideration.
To begin the process, the Task Force hired an expert firm to conduct a University-wide audit of marketing and communications operations. Over two years, an extensive list of outcomes has been achieved. The Task Force is pleased to report that its charge was successfully accomplished and all major recommendations and strategic issues identified in the communications audit report were addressed.
The chief outcome is the campus community's work in clarifying the University's brand messages—articulating that "Portland State University's intentional academic engagement and connection with the Portland urban area provides exceptional opportunities for learning, service, research, and achievement." Defining themes are urban, sustainable, diverse, opportunity for all, research, partner, international, and surrounded by beauty.
A supporting visual identity program was also developed. It includes a new PSU logo, three sub-brand logos, eight school/college logo treatments, re-design of Portland State Magazine, publication design, top-level Web design, stationery, business cards, envelopes, electronic templates for stationery, flyers, and brochures, mailing labels, an identity standards guide, guidelines for logo, color, and typography, ad design, presentation folders, note cards, electronic signature, name tags, print newsletter design, and electronic newsletter design.
Nearly 4,000 members of the campus community participated over the two-year development period. The length of the process was critical to internal buy-in and laid the groundwork for a receptive campus climate. To date, the new identity has been broadly adopted and well received across campus. This process has also helped set the stage for further academic planning and prioritization of programmatic leadership positions.
The Subcommittee focused on areas of best practice and identified these recommendations for improved recruitment and outreach.
